| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
darius mclever
   |
Posted - 2009.11.01 18:17:00 -
[1]
"mom, i dont have enough targets and they dont want to move the lvl4 agents into lowsec so i can gank more people."
this has been beaten to death like once per week. not everyone wants to play your way of the game. some people just want to run the casual mission after the work. highsec lvl4 mission runner are the ones buying most of the faction loot you get in your vast of 0.0 space. (want to ruin your own market?) most people would stick to highsec lvl3s. there are already lvl4 ql20 in lowsec and still people run in highsec. there are lvl5s with much higher rewards and still people run lvl4s in highsec.
just to some up the arguments that i remembered without reading the old threads.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 01:28:00 -
[2]
ok simple market 101: nobody will use faction items for missioning in lowsec. so the demand will go down. while all the people doing ratting and probing will still bring the same amount to jita. so more stock + less demand => falling prices.
your point was?
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 10:56:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: wallenbergaren
It's not about wanting more targets in lowsec, it's about people playing this game like a totally mindless grind MMO. I don't care if you remove lvl 4s from highsec or simply make the ones outside highsec five times as profitable, but the current balance is f***ed because right now there is no real incentive to make money outside highsec (on a personal level)
so because people build different sandcastles in the sandbox, they need to be nerfed?
they are still big part of the player base and contribute on other levels to the game.
you should step back from dictating how people should play the game. |
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 19:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Markus Reese
Counterpoint to the profit arguement that the L4s are too much isk, just think, if mining was revamped to remove macros and tritanium hit 4isk/unit again, tritanium mining would outprofit missioning. Should all tritanium be moved to lowsec? As well, if this happened, cost of ships would go up, as would ammo, fittings, etc and suddlenly mission running isn't so profitable.
my corp mate really liked the 15+m/hour during the 4isk/trit period^^
|
| |
|